The future of Battery Technology – A look at what's coming next

The future of Battery Technology – A look at what's coming next

future technology will be enabled by new types of battery technology, we look at what’s coming next. Solid state, graphene and over the air charging to name a few Battery technology is an area that has seen little progress and innovation, but there are some exciting solutions that can help us to imagine mobility in a different way.

We list down battery technologies that hope to give us longer-lasting smartphones, better electric transport, and more efficient energy storage.


  1. Kram on October 4, 2019 at 2:40 pm

    Device makers don’t want batteries that don’t die. That will slow demand for devices.

  2. tellittomyvoicemail on October 4, 2019 at 2:47 pm


  3. korfenkeil on October 4, 2019 at 2:48 pm

    its ridiculus how much video material is stolen from other channels. xou should be ashamed

  4. lazer tag on October 4, 2019 at 2:49 pm

    graphene ultracapacitors are the future

  5. Ravi Christian on October 4, 2019 at 2:49 pm

    Thanks for the informative video

  6. Everest on October 4, 2019 at 2:49 pm

    So wouldn’t solid state lithium ion be the first new phone batterry type within 5 years then? Or am I wording the term wrong.
    I feel the need to bring up how the Note 9 S-Pen is a supercapacitor haha. Mabye that could be in phones eventually too?

  7. J Hendricks on October 4, 2019 at 2:50 pm

    Graphene is just starting, so many applications, I already want the improved oil in my car, better tires, batteries etc etc.

  8. hook blieght on October 4, 2019 at 2:51 pm

    bla bla bla

  9. 张三 on October 4, 2019 at 2:51 pm

    Where can I get one of these Batteries? From where can I buy these Products?

  10. aljawisa on October 4, 2019 at 2:53 pm

    The new world order loves to drag it’s feet on breakthrough technologies. My speculation is that this dendrite problem with batteries was solved way back at the invention of lithium ion batteries back in the early 90’s. They’ve been feeding us, in all this time, the scaled down problematic versions of these technologies. The main interests of ‘the powers that shouldn’t be’ is to keep and umbilical cord upon every member of humanity to the point that you can never escape their demands and control. You are Niel, and you must serve as the battery for global domination and control. You may see this technology released if you can survive the forced global reduction in the human population.

    But in the meantime, come back to this video in 20 years or so, and you will still be asking the question of ‘how long?’ Richard Hoagland has been on NASA’s ass since the early 80’s, and asking all this time himself ‘how long?’ How long has Stanton Freedman been asking his questions? Walter Jenkins, who has bettered Stanley Meyer in producing an all water vehicle, attended a government meeting on his vehicle, and while leaving that meeting a security guard working that meeting told him ‘you’re 29.’ Yes he was the 29 inventor among others who also proved infront of government officials, that yes, you can run a car on water. So keep on waiting forever, or invent one of these batteries yourself. You can only do yourself and show some gifted others how to replicate the process. But you’ll never change society as a whole.

    I have no doubt that there are individuals out there, who have duplicated these breakthroughs on their own, and who are secretly of the grid. But that is the only way freedom can be maintained, in secret and with an incredible amount of effort coming from individuals, and applied individually.

    Musk’s is fluke, and he’s not much of a breakaway player. And his self driving cars still leave the powers that be in ultimate control. Furthermore that fact he won’t allow you to uber or lyft his electric vehicles speaks volumes. I do not believe this guy is for freedom, and no doubt he’s also aware of these breakthroughs and can replicate them. All these new inventors want to maintain the dependence of old forms of technology, just in a quote un-quote, cleaner form. Just like those hydrogen networks that seem just like going get gasoline, Musk has his networks of recharging, that will initially be cheap, just like gasoline was for many decades, but overtime will become more expensive overtime. So people will be forced to eventually limit their travel.

    Furthermore when you look at most ICE cars, their travel range is generally 350-600 miles or range. Overtime don’t expect electric cars to get much better. The ideal that ‘the powers shouldn’t be,’ is to keep things as close to the old structure as possible.

    The biggest form of control is always never allowing people to easily get allodial title/land patents.

  11. Roy Batty on October 4, 2019 at 2:53 pm

    The future of electric vehicles depends on revolutionary battery technology, because what they have now is at least 20 years shy of where it needs to be.

  12. Michael chuan on October 4, 2019 at 2:55 pm

    Two rubbish fields exist around us, medical and battery technology. Over 50 years only minor improvement or no improvement at all.

    The main objective just want to cheat our money only. Greedy cooperates

  13. Lemme Get uhhh on October 4, 2019 at 2:58 pm

    Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk need to just spend all their extra money on finding a way to get graphene out of the lab. The person that finds out how to do that first is going to rule the planet.

  14. Singularity on October 4, 2019 at 2:59 pm

    You have a 5000 mah powerbank, my phone has 5300mah battery

  15. MOHAMMED ABDUL NAYEEM on October 4, 2019 at 3:02 pm

    2:42 theme is copied from real engineering channel

  16. carlindelco on October 4, 2019 at 3:03 pm


  17. Barry Retmanski on October 4, 2019 at 3:03 pm

    What is this bullshit about batteries having no improvement or innovation? What are you talking about? There is a very clear history and progression of battery technology!

    You lost me with that statement, no need to watch any further…

  18. MrBazsi888 on October 4, 2019 at 3:04 pm

    You want 100% energy independence ? Zero-carbon footprint system will work like this in the future: PV-cell on the roof > electrolyse water generating H2 > store H2 in safe form (powder, inventer: Gerard Lugtigheid) > use needed H2 powder for warm water & eletricity (along the whole wintertime!). Done.

  19. Roland Cresswell on October 4, 2019 at 3:05 pm

    New car batteries will be nice too

  20. Weeb's Gaming on October 4, 2019 at 3:06 pm

    This is almost impossible because we need a liquid electrolyte to freely move ions when gaining charge. If we were to have batteries that act like giant capacitors then they would lose charge over time regardless of their current state due to the fact that we can’t have a true vacuum state in capacitors. This is unreliable to the current batteries.

  21. jain Raj on October 4, 2019 at 3:09 pm

    i am one of that system waiting for long life battery or alternatively work as battery.
    thanks for nice video.

  22. Black Sun on October 4, 2019 at 3:09 pm

    graphene = the vibranium of our modern world

  23. Adeeb Md on October 4, 2019 at 3:10 pm

    Still waiting but when

  24. stevin47 on October 4, 2019 at 3:12 pm

  25. Raymond Lee on October 4, 2019 at 3:14 pm

    Yes. Why is it taking so long for this technology to take off?

  26. Piccardogt on October 4, 2019 at 3:15 pm

    We could have allready better batteries but no… they r pigs that want more MONEY! Look at chinesse guyes they 4 example have eletric cars that can make 400+ km and charge in 15min from 2005! If we have such a batteries the pigs wont get that much money couse we dont need to repair ouer cars, no need of so much gasoline ect… that’s the real reason lol

  27. Theo Aspinall on October 4, 2019 at 3:16 pm

    2-3 years well that explains why my battery dies quickly, it’s about 4 and a half years old

  28. HornyTrolllololololool on October 4, 2019 at 3:18 pm

    Graphene is the most interesting one, hopefully samsung will be able to mass produce at afforable prices, still good job samsung.

  29. Boyi Bolomi on October 4, 2019 at 3:18 pm

    Good topic

  30. HornyTrolllololololool on October 4, 2019 at 3:18 pm

    I didn’t know there were so many options lol

  31. David McDonald on October 4, 2019 at 3:18 pm

    One you might have missed it came out bout a month before the video John Goodenough’s glass battery. Also the Honda NASA fluoride battery.

  32. Eric Kosak on October 4, 2019 at 3:20 pm

    Goodenough and Braga have interesting results with solid state batteries.

  33. RHIANN GACUSAN on October 4, 2019 at 3:20 pm

    the only way to improve this is to start thinking nuclear or atomic.

  34. Midas Snap on October 4, 2019 at 3:20 pm

    It’s always in the future.

  35. John Due on October 4, 2019 at 3:21 pm

    In 1995, the Danish company I worked for as an electronic engineer, had a general patent covering communication between a rechargeable battery and charger/equipment.
    My thoughts at that time was that the implementation of this function would be way too expensive, – thus the patent would have no value.
    In 2000 the company was bought by a major US semiconductor manufacture for this patent alone and the Danish operation closed, – all hands were laid off.
    Just one example of how an idea can change from impossible to main stream in 5 years.
    History shows that, if the major players in the industry really put their money where there mouth is, development of seemingly impossible products and techniques can be done within a relatively short time span.

  36. Ronald Garrison on October 4, 2019 at 3:21 pm

    Ahhh, but will it stop male pattern baldness? Gotcha there…

  37. marvin luther on October 4, 2019 at 3:24 pm

    yeah we need that shit now but all we get are stupid utopian videos about that crap… i dare to call this a big hoax!!!!

  38. Niklas Hultkrantz on October 4, 2019 at 3:25 pm

    Isn’t it called silica and not silicon? Silicon is a type of plastic runner used in gaskets for example

  39. Whisker Stix Fishing on October 4, 2019 at 3:25 pm

    I would love to see the performance of a graphene battery that’s equilivant to the ability of a cr3023 coin cell battery. Since I use those for our led products, one 2032 makes out light sticks last well over 400 hours on one battery. If we could make use of this graphene tech, I’d love to see the possibilities for newer models

  40. Larry Olson on October 4, 2019 at 3:27 pm

    Please keep us posted on graphene’s progress. Thanks

  41. Samuel Colt on October 4, 2019 at 3:27 pm

    I think they’re just conning people, so they can receive all kinds of monetary grants.

  42. King ARkaMAni on October 4, 2019 at 3:27 pm

    graphene is discovered to be unpromising (small hope ) is left for this material , and you saying as graphene is transparent so that could make a transparent phone as well ..i mean where is the processor the silicon , cables , copper and other components. for God’s sake.

  43. Kars Van der heijden on October 4, 2019 at 3:30 pm

    I saw nothing about fluoride batteries.

  44. Blu on October 4, 2019 at 3:30 pm

    so sick and tired of waiting. they promised 10 years ago, for a revolutionary battery.

  45. JAKE TORRALBA on October 4, 2019 at 3:30 pm

    I believe the graphen battery is the key of high level battery technology. Only few companies have been using the graphene battery technology like samsung and huwaie for their cellphone because mass production still increasing. But more companies are starring to apply this technology. Product competation will lead companies to improve this technology and until the time they can make Super Battery that hundred times better. A small super battery that only a size of small brick can restore 10 gigawatts and can be charged within a minutes. Imagine using a super battery on your cell phone. You can use your cellphone for more than a year without charging and that is the future that we have been wanted for a long time.

  46. Robaire Beckwith on October 4, 2019 at 3:31 pm

    Factually interesting but the narration style is unbearable and expressionless

  47. Jonathon Deeds on October 4, 2019 at 3:32 pm

    All these imagined technologies that can barely make it into production due to unsolvable technical or cost issues.

  48. Hold Door on October 4, 2019 at 3:33 pm

    lemon baterry = future

  49. Дмитрий Белан on October 4, 2019 at 3:36 pm

    Electric power multiplier based on MGA (Andrus Molecular Generator).
    We are looking for investments up to 70 million US dollars.

    I ask you to familiarize yourself with the video "The multiplier of electrical power on the basis of MGA (Andrus Molecular Generator)" Turn on English subtitles. Autor’s comment to video "Multi-power electric power on the base of MGA (Molecular generator Andrus)" (for specialists) –
    From the video it can be seen that the Electric power multiplier with an area of 240 cm2 in comparison with a solar cell of a solar panel of the same area surpasses the latter by 23 times in power and this figure can increase, while the Multiplier works around the clock and year-round.
    At the same time, the Multiplier does not require repair, maintenance and related infrastructure such as gas stations.
    A multiplier is a simplified cylindrical version of an MGA with external electrical excitation of its materials (see fig. 2 Basic flat MGA (see figure 1 with self-excited materials has no electronic circuits and can produce a constant current with a given voltage for 10 years or more.

    "The molecular generator of Andrus – MGA" (Business Plan MGA 2018 – – this is the source power supply that does not require recharging:
    – MGA-3W, 5V for powering gadgets without recharging;
    – MGA-20kW, 230 V for power supply of apartments and private houses;
    – MGA-150kW, 400 V as power sources for electric vehicles and other vehicles.

    The implementation of MGA and Multiplier projects takes about three years and then immediately follows the sale of commercial samples and technologies to Ilona Mask and others at a public auction at the price of three lots from 1,500,000,000 US dollars.
    The share of the investor on this project is 26% – this is from 390 million dollars.
    The profit compared to the investment will increase in: $ 390,000,000: $ 70,000,000 = 5.57 times.

    The purpose of our video is to show that the declared Multiplier parameters – input (Uin = 220V) and output (Uout = 265 ÷ 270 V, Iout = 0.29A) – really take place, the MGA project is a worker, and the authors fully own the issues implementation.
    MGA has rather complicated methods for controlling input materials, as well as all stages of its production at the molecular level, since Electricity is produced by materials without any additions. This is similar to the use of finger batteries, only for 10 years or more.
    The multiplier has a more coarse and simplified packing materials MGA, but also an additional external source of excitation materials (external electrical network). It is much cheaper than MGA.
    When using our Multiplier as an autonomous power source, it will be necessary to replace the external city electric network with two small batteries with electronic circuitry, and it will also work around the clock and year-round, but it is not suitable for gadgets because of the complex circuitry with batteries and is mainly suitable for use in apartments and private homes. Thus, for flat cars and gadgets, only a flat MGA is suitable.
    A cheaper option is possible – a hybrid device for obtaining significant power. A low-power MGA plus multiplier cells is used as the external source.

    We hope for a quick response.
    Sincerely, V. Andrus, Scientific Director.
    BSA Ltd., Ukraine.

  50. Brian N/A on October 4, 2019 at 3:37 pm

    Hemp is similar to graphene, and cheaper to produce